As can be seen the Law Society are still trying everything they can think of to shut down the remaining websites of 'discontent' that shows just how badly their complains procedures are "European Court of Justice's ruling on the right to be forgotten online"
I have had dealings with three Legal Ombudsmen, first Ann Abraham a complete waste of time then Zahida Manzoor now this one had no idea what her job was and clearly was running a 'Law Society Protection Racket'. She said I had accused her of 'sexual discrimination' which clearly was the case and she sent me a solicitor's letter from Mace & Jones Solicitors whom she had instructed, what did they came-up with "If you were to institute proceeding, our client would apply to strike out the proceedings on the grounds they are out of time and would also seek an order for cost against you" (see last paragraph of letter) these people know all the tricks which of course we don't and they know it.Then I met Adam Sampson who had his hand in the Till and the MoJ commented "...was not a fit and proper person to continue to hold the position of Accounts Officer..." and clearly had carried on the 'Law Society Protection Racket', he lied to me and said the Law Society does not come under his jurisdiction and he sent me to meet the Law Societies Pitbulls
The Law Society is planning to use
the European Court of Justice's ruling on the right to be forgotten
online to challenge anti-solicitor websites, Legal Futures can
The Law Society is currently monitoring
12 anti-solicitor websites in the wake of the in 2011 to bring down
Solicitors from Hell.
According to papers seen by its membership
committee last week, the society periodically takes and preserves
screenshots, and logs and investigates all complaints from members
about the sites, but none are generating the volume of complaints
necessary to justify legal action.
However, the committee was told that
the Google v González case "may provide a new legal basis
for a representative complaint to Google about harmful websites, and
if that does not succeed, to the Information Commissioner's Office
The papers explained: "The aim would be to see Google remove the links to a site from their search engine results. If successful, it would vastly reduce the damage sites can do. The aim is to utilise this approach for the site with the highest number of complaints to see if it works."