"A solicitor who fails to honour an undertaking is prima facie guilty of professional misconduct"
But the Law Society does not 'Up-Hold' their own rules

Client Care Agreement
At the bottom is part of the Client Care Agreement letter sent to me by Thos Boyd Whyte Solicitors it shows I gave instructions and Thos Boyd Whyte agreed to act on my behalf. - It also clearly states Gordon Luckhurst is the Senior Partner 'I may raise any aspect of the service I am unhappy with' and at the bottom it shows an agreement has been made.
Rule 18.02 states;
4. The giver cannot unilaterally withdraw from an undertaking once the recipient has placed reliance on it.
And;
5. The OSS has no power to order the release of a solicitor from the terms of an undertaking. This is a matter for the Court, or the person entitled to the benefit of the undertaking.
And the Law Society Rules Say about this;
"A solicitor who fails to honour an undertaking is prima facie guilty of professional misconduct".

The Law Society advised me to make a complaint against Thos Boyd Whyte for refusing to honour the Client Care Agreement and before that complaint came under investigation the Law Society illegal gave information from my complaint to my Solicitor and the Law Society Ethics Committee advised Gordon Luckhurst to sack me because there was a Conflict of Interest. - Zahida Manzoor, that 'Bee's Knees' of the 'Complaints World' believes it is correct for the Law Society to break all the rules in the book not only is she part of the 'Protection Team' but click Here to see the rest.

Top . . . . . . . Back