17 June 2003
D C Entwisle
Manchester M3 3JZ
Complaint to : Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
Against : Thos Boyd Whyte Solicitors, Bexleyheath, Kent. Eng.
you for your letter dated 13 June. My final impression is that after
making a number of observations even suggesting the 'Client Care Agreement',
that include Mr Luckhurst's refusal to see me, was dealt with when you
know it had not, you are now trying to crawl out backwards to save your
own skins. I believe you make the 'Mafia' seem like 'Pillars of Society',
I know for a fact I would have more faith in their justice than I would
now have in any form of justice that the British Law Society could come
have in the past quoted the Ombudsman's 'little blue book' especially
the bit "What the Ombudsman will do is check that all your complaints
were addressed and that this was done within a reasonable time".
Now come on this 'little blue book' and the 'Client Care Agreement'
are, as I have previously stated, as useful as a bit of 'dog shit' and
smells a far lot more.
fact is you don't even have to take any notice of what I have said but
just look at the opinions of a Judge, a Barrister, Ann Abraham (previous
Ombudsman), a Solicitor from TBW and the notes that solicitors from
TBW pinned to some of my correspondence suggesting I had cause to 'sue
them' to realise and understand just how bad Thos Boyd Whyte conducted
my litigation. Just what have you people done? You have allowed 'incompetent'
solicitors (Mr Higgins QC opinion) to carry on with no 'supervision'
whatever and allow a Senior Partner to stay in charge of complaints
matters when he deliberately disregarded all the rules. You people are
just as 'disgraceful' as Thos Boyd Whyte Solicitors.
is an excerpt from the 'The Lawyer.com' that sums up my solicitors'
- Special Report
Too little too late
16/06/03 Simon Monty QC
This goes to emphasise not only the need to pursue and prosecute litigation
claims promptly, and not to rely on leaving the commencement of proceedings
until the last minute, but also that professional negligence litigation
is a specialised field in which there are many traps for the unwary
Monty QC is a barrister at Four New Square
unlike myself who has on many occasions corrected points that yourself,
the OSS and TBW have got wrong, I have even stated in places where lies
have been told, where evidence had been invented also where it was denied
other evidence exists, no-one has once corrected me or even suggested
I was wrong in anything I have written or said it was not true, which
I can truthfully say to the best of my knowledge "Is
the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth",
and just to prove it I can produce evidence to support it. If you had
just once shown that I had or did try to be 'devious' or 'dishonest'
you would have at least had some creditability in your current stance.
What we do know is all the lies, deceit and dishonesty have come from
members of the Law Society and right down to the Legal Ombudsman have
failed to address the issue which show how 'one-sided' and 'corrupt'
the 'Complaints Procedure' is.
B R Gray
I will publish this letter on the Internet just so it will be seen that
as far as the Law Society are concerned, the 'peasants' of today are
treated no better than the 'peasants' were in 1381 (Wat Tyler, peasants
revolt! (see my website www.solicitorsfromhell.com))
------Previous letter to
Simon D C Entwisle-----------